Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (4) TMI 1558

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ormation from the Investigation Wing , New Delhi that certain persons called 'beneficiaries' have resorted to money laundering by giving unaccounted cash to entry operators and in turn taking from them cheques/DDs in the garb of share application money or sale proceeds of non existent goods thereby ploughing back to undeclared cash into the accounts or business, learned AO rejected the reasons and issued notice u/s 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") proposing to re-open the proceedings stating that he has reason to believe that an income of Rs. 15 lacs plus commission @ 2% thereon amounting to Rs. 30,000/- totaling to Rs. 15,30,000/- has escaped assessment during the assessment year. Learned AO heard the assessee and disposed of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e sustained. 5. Ld. DR submitted that the information received from investigation wing is also valid information, constituting a valid source of information and it cannot be brushed aside simply because it is from a source other than the own knowledge of the Ld. AO. Further, so far as merits are concerned, He submitted that sufficiency of the material is not a consideration to quash the reopening proceedings. Since the identity of the parties was not established, genuineness of the transaction or the creditworthiness of the party could not be tested. He placed reliance on the order of the ld. CIT(A). 6. In reply, learned AR submitted that all the documents are submitted before the learned CIT(A) and such facts find a place in the impu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0,000/- plus commission @ 2% thereon amounting to Rs. 30,000/- , totaling to Rs. 15,30,000/- has escaped assessment during the assessment year. O n t h e basis of this information, I have reason to believe that the incomes described above have escaped assessment and the case is fit for issuing notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961." 8. In the case of MRY Auto components Ltd. (supra) also the contents and language of the reasons are identical. A coordinate bench of this Tribunal referred to the above reasons held in MRY Auto Components Ltd. as follows: " T h e investigating wing of the income Tax Department had unearthed a huge money laundering mechanism wherein it was established that bogus accommodation entries were provid....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o the assessee to seek their legal remedies after rejection of the objections of the assessee. In view of the fact that the AO has disposed of the objections of the assessee on 22.11.11 and passed the assessment order on 19.12.2011, it is clear that no such time was granted to the assessee. Further, the reasons recorded at the time of assumption of jurisdiction by the AO that the assessee has received an accommodation entry of Rs. 15 lacs whereas at the time of framing of assessment, the assessee was assessed the share application money to the tune of Rs. 2.15 crores. We find reason in the submission of learned AR that in view of the decision in PCIT vs. RMG Polyvinyl (I) Ltd.386 ITR 5 (Bom), such an error indicates non application of mind ....