Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (7) TMI 577

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gaged in developing, operating and maintaining airport and related infrastructure at the New Delhi airport. For the AY 2007-08, the assessee filed the return of income declaring a total loss of Rs. 150,55,30,337/- and revised its return of income on 30/03/2009 declaring a total loss of Rs. 149,48,78,939/-. During the scrutiny of the return of income, Learned assessing officer ("Ld. AO") made certain additions and determined the income of the assessee at Rs. 62,69,55,060/-. 3. However, subsequently, on examination of the income tax assessment records of the assessee, Learned CIT found that the assessee company had received Passenger Service Fee (PSF), but the same has not been disclosed as part of revenue receipt amounting to Rs. 77,06,88....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as failed to assess the revenue receipt of Rs. 77,06,88,000/-on account of passenger service fee for the assessment year 2007-08 in the regular assessment order, and therefore, such order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Ld. CIT refused to keep the matter in abeyance since no decision of MOCA was communicated. Ld. CIT, accordingly set aside the issue and directed the Ld. AO to reframe the assessment by taking into account the revenue receipt on account of passenger service fee. Aggrieved by the order under section 263 of the Act, assessee preferred this appeal. 6. It is the argument of the Ld. AR that the passenger service fee is comprised of two components, namely, security component to the extent of 65% and faci....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the preamble that any balance lying in the escrow bank account shall be transferred to the AAI for payment to CISF for CISF personnel deployed/services provided by CISF at other airports in and around India. 7. Basing on the recitals of the OMDA, SOP for account/audit of passenger service fee and the Escrow Agreement he submitted that the assessee has no control over the funds that are deposited in the escrow account for CISF PSF component inasmuch as it is for the exclusive purpose of purchasing the machinery required by the CISF, payments to be made to CISF and the balance to be transferred to AAI for payment to CISF for CISF personnel deployed/services provided by CISF at other airports in and around India. According to the assessee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the Ld. AR that the security component of the PSF is not income in the hands of the assessee as is held by the Mumbai Tribunal in the above referred case. He further submitted that in any case it is a contentious issue not amenable to the jurisdiction of the Learned CIT under section 263 of the Act. 10. Para contra, it is the argument of the Ld. DR that in the Official Memorandum dated 30/06/2006 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes(CBDT), Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India it is clearly held that the statutory levies collected by an assessee in the course of its business to be eventually turned over to the Government is income within the meaning of the Income Tax Act (Chowringhee Sales Bureau Priv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Ld. AO, Learned CIT is justified in revising the same under section 263 of the Act. 13. She further brought to our notice the order dated 31/01/2018 in ITA numbers 2636, 4213/Del/2012 and 3707/Del/2013 for assessment years 2008-09 to 2010-11 in assessee's own case wherein a coordinate bench of this Tribunal held that the facts relating to the Delhi International Airport Private Limited (supra) are slightly different from the facts involved in the case of Mumbai International Airport Ltd and that a coordinate bench of this daily tribunal remanded the matter to the Ld. Assessing Officer for verification as to the appropriation of the dividend amount and the treatment given to the surplus amount. She, therefore, submits that in view of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o AAI for payment of CISF for CISF personnel deployed/services provided by CISF at other airports in and around India. 16. Having gone through the OMDA Agreement, SOP and the escrow Agreement in the light of other relevant papers furnished in the paper book we are convinced that prima facie there appears to be no control for the assessee over the security component of the PSF collected by the airliner and deposited into the escrow account meant to make the security purposes. 17. Further we have gone through the orders of the Mumbai Tribunal in the case of Mumbai International Airport Private Limited (supra) and a coordinate bench of the Delhi Tribunal in assessee's own case (supra). In the former case the Tribunal returned a finding t....