Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (7) TMI 400

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Appellant Sri H.Thirumalesh, Adv.- For the Respondent ORDER Both the Learned Counsels submit that the controversy involved in the present case is covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Smt B. Narasamma V/s. Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Karnataka & Another, [Civil Appeal  No.4149  of  2007  dated  11.08.2016],  ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mercial goods without change of their identity as such, are merely subject to some processing or finishing, or are merely joined together, and therefore remain commercially the same goods which cannot be taxed again, given the rigor of Section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act. We fail to see how the aforesaid judgment can further carry the case of the revenue. 18. We may note that in Civil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The High Court, in the impugned judgment dated 1.9.2006, unfortunately adverted only to the rectification order dated 30.11.2005 and not to the original order of 11.1.2002 and thus dismissed the revision petition stating that no question of law arose. Ordinarily, we would have set aside the judgment and remanded the matter back to the High Court to determine the matter on merit, but at this point ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the appellant is engaged in works contracts of fabrication and creation of doors, window frames, grills, etc., in which they claimed exemption for iron and steel goods that went into the creation of these items, after which the said doors, window frames, grills, etc., were fitted into buildings and other structures. On facts, therefore, we find that the High Court's judgment is correct and does....