Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (5) TMI 1584

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent : Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate. Sanjay Karol, J (oral) It is the common case of the parties, as is also evident from the impugned order(Annexure P-A), dated 21.10.2015, passed in ITA Nos. 133/CHD/2010 & 463/CHD/2011 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Division Bench, Chandigarh, that the Tribunal did not discuss the evidence while examining the credit worthiness of the creditors a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y has to be adjudicated by the fact finding authorities. 3. Noticeably, in the instant case, which fact is also not in dispute that out of 64 creditors, notices never came to be issued to 11 creditors. Quite apparently, learned Tribunal without discussing the evidence, if any, placed on record by the assessee with regard to the creditworthiness and genuineness of the transactions, proceeded to ho....