Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (6) TMI 1367

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ER The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.1142 of 2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Coimbatore. 2. The respondent/complainant had filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C., against the petitioner/accused for an alleged offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the 'NI Act') 1881. 3. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Bank, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore, to the respondent/complainant. When the cheque was presented for an encashment/realization by the complainant through his bankers viz., M/s. Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Limited, the same was returned for the reason insufficient funds . Therefore, the respondent/complainant issued a statutory notice to the petitioner/accused on 17.07.2012 and the petitioner/accused se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that the complainant sold the property to M/s.Saravanan Estates Private Limited only on the assurance given by the accused and that the accused towards part payment issued a cheque for a sum of Rs. 25,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Lakh Only). He relied on the decision in the case of Mahar Banu v. N.Justin, reported in [(2001) M.L.J. (Crl.) 74], and contended that the question as to whether the cheq....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....against the present petitioner, the entire proceedings cannot be quashed especially when there is a clear cut statement in the complaint that the accused gave an assurance to the complainant to pay the balance amount of Rs. 3,58,87,500/- at the time of execution of the documents. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/complainant the question as to whether the c....