2018 (6) TMI 1349
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Rahul Tangri, Advocate - for the appellant Ms. Tamana Alam, DR - for the respondent ORDER Per : Bijay kumar The present appeal is filed against the above mention Order-in-Appeal. The issue involve in this case pertains to inclusion of VAT subsidy amount (in the form of Vat-37 B challans, which can be utilized for subsequent period for discharge VAT), for arriving at the assessable val....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 7. We have heard both sides at length and perused the appeal record. As out lined above, the appellants are covered by the Investment Promotion Schemes of the Rajasthan Government. In terms of the various schemes of the Rajasthan Government, the appellants are required to discharge their VAT liability by making payment of the same. Out of such VAT credited to the Government, a certain portion i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....per Synotex India Ltd. In the above decision the Apex Court has categorically held that after 01/07/2000, unless the sales tax/VAT is actually paid to the good, no benefit towards excise duty can be given in terms of Section 4(3)(d). However, we note that the Tribunal in the case of Welspun Corporation Ltd. (Supra) has distinguished the decision of the Apex Court in the light of Gujarat VAT Act, 2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... taking the view that VAT liability discharged by utilizing such subsidy challans cannot be taken as VAT actually paid. 10. It is pertinent to reproduce the observations of the Tribunal in the Welspun Corporation Ltd. case "5.1 The Respondent company opted for "Remission of Tax Scheme" and was thus eligible for the Capital subsidy in the form of remission of Sales Tax subject to ....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI