Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (6) TMI 1344

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at Industrial Area, Site-IV Sahibabad and the other at A/4/2, South Side of G.T. Road, Industrial Area, Ghaziabad. The appellant availed Cenvat Credit of Rs. 41,701/- on the strength of Invoice No. 1152 - 236 dated 18.04.1998, No. 1152 - 244 dated 28.04.1999 and No. 1152 - 247 dated 21.04.1998 issued by Steel Authority of India (Durgapur Steel Plant). The said invoice was in the name of its sister concern Goyal Gases Ltd., Ghaziabad and consignee -M/s Goyal M.G. Gases, Ghaziabad - appellant. As the invoice was not in the name of appellant, credit taken was objected to by Revenue. The appellant reversed the said credit under protest by debiting the credit in RG-23A Part-II, vide Entry No. 1396 dated 15 January, 1999. Thereafter, the appellan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Rs. 41,701/- and reflected this in their ER-1 return for the month of December, 2003. Such taking of credit was objected to by Revenue resulting in issuance of Show Cause Notice No. 3/2005 - 06 issued mainly on the ground of unjust enrichment, as it appeared to the Revenue in view of the order of the Apex Court in Mafatlal Industries Ltd., vs. Union of India 1997 (89) ELT 247 (SC). The SCN also relied on the ruling in the case of Union of India vs. Solar Pesticides Private Ltd., reported at 2000 (116) ELT 401. The said SCN was adjudicated whereby the Assistant Commissioner recorded the finding that the appeal of the appellant-assessee was allowed by Commissioner (Appeals) vide order dated 14 November, 2003. Further on the basis of the said ....