Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (6) TMI 1340

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt sometime in 1997 set up a plant for manufacture of Purified Terepthelic Acid (PTA). The manufacturing activity started sometime in September, 1999 and from November, 1997 to March, 1999, Cenvat credit of Rs. 1,27,95,483/- was taken in respect of the various inputs. Since the quantity of the final products was not up to the mark, the manufacturing activities stopped totally in August, 2000. Since then, there has been no manufacture and the plant is lying closed. The appellant, however, have been selling the finished products and the last sale was in April, 2008. The department initiated proceedings by issue of five show cause notices for demand of Cenvat credit totaling Rs. 1,27,95,483/- for the period from November, 1997 to March, 1999 o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Commissioner was directed to adjudicate the show cause notice after giving finding on the above points. In the de-novo order dated 23.12.2013, the learned Commissioner has confirmed the total Cenvat credit demand of Rs. 1,27,95,483/- along with interest and has imposed penalty of equal amount on the appellant against which this appeal has been filed. 3. Learned Counsel for appellant, pleaded that the inputs in respect of which the Cenvat credit had been taken, had been taken up for manufacture and some of such inputs are in semi-finished state and the remaining quantity of inputs were converted into final product which is still lying in stock, that the appellant used the inputs in the manufacture of finished goods, out of which, 1172 M....