2018 (6) TMI 1287

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....peal:- 1) The Ld. CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal of assessee that the assessee has no jurisdiction for appeal before The Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals. 2) The Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming in adopting the valuation method while arriving the value by the AVO. 3) The Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the sales instances relied by AVO is not comparable. 4) The Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the adoption of the rate of valuation by AVO. 4) The Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the appearance of registered valuer is not called by the Income Tax Officer as well as A VO as per the provision of Wealth Tax Act, 1957. 5) The Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the issue the direction regarding d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 6. Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee had transferred his ancestral agricultural land and declared income from Long Term Capital Gain. The Assessing Officer had assessed the income in the hands of the assessee. Aggrieved with which the assessee filed first appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Pune. The assessee has filed appeals before the Tribunal which are pending for disposal being ITA Nos. 2315 to 2317/PUN/2016 for the assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2010-11. During the appellate proceedings, the assessee had submitted a fresh Valuation Report as on 01.04.1981 to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) who in turn, referred the matter to the Assistant Valuation Officer, Solapur to determine th....