Upgrade to AI Search ✕

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
     - Overview Summary
     - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     - Relevant Case Laws
     - Tariff / Classification / HSN
     - Expert views from TaxTMI
     - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

2018 (6) TMI 999

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....umalai, Advocate, for respondent Order The issue involved in the present case is, for filing of refund claim under Rule 5 read with Notification No.27/2012-CE(NT) dated 18.6.2012, whether the relevant date should be taken from the date of invoice or date of FIRC or end of the quarter wherein the FIRC is received. 2. Shri Dilip Shinde, learned Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of ....

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

.... wherein FIRCs are received. The facts of the present case are that the respondents filed refund claim for the quarter July 2012 to September 2012 on 9.7.2013, for April 2013 to June 2013 on 4.3.2014, for July 2013 to September 2013 on 24.6.2014, for October 2013 to December 2013 on 25.9.2014, for April 2014 to June 2014 on 28.3.2014 and for July 2014 to September 2014 on 30.6.2015. From this fact....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

2018 (6) TMI 999