2018 (6) TMI 979

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sugar Ltd only for waiver of penalty imposed under Section 11AC. 2. The fact of the case is that the appellant were manufacturing and clearing coal ash which was generated during the process of production of electricity which is classifiable under Chapter 26 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and attracts duty of 1/2%under Notification 1/2013-CE subject to the condition that no CENVAT credit on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....India v. Dharmendra Textile Processors [2008 (231) ELT 3 (SC) penalty imposed under Section 11AC cannot be reduced. Therefore, appellant is before us. 3. None appeared on behalf of appellant and Shri S J Sahu, Learned Authorised Representative appearing on behalf Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. 4. I have carefully considered the submissions made by Learned Authorised Repre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the confirmation of duty and payment thereof stand maintained. In the facts, as discussed above, there is no suppression on the part of the appellant. The ingredients for imposing penalty under Section 11AC was wrongly invoked. As regard the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dharmendra Textile Processors' it deals with the a situation where there is suppression of fact and impos....