TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2007 (2) TMI 186
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....reference and the civil court enhanced the compensation to Rs. 71,380 per acre. On appeal, the High Court enhanced the compensation to Rs. 2,83,000 per acre. By virtue of the orders of the High Court, the assessee received additional compensation amounting to Rs. 15,26,135 and interest on the additional compensation amounting to Rs. 28,58,622 on April 9, 1991, and on receiving the amounts, he invested the entire additional compensation in the UTI Capital Gains Scheme of 1983, on October 1, 1991, i.e., within six months from the date of receipt of the additional compensation and sought exemption under section 54E of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"). The Assessing Officer denied this exemption on the ground that investment in th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s still pending before the High Court. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim of the assessee and the entire amount withdrawn by the assessee was brought to tax in the assessment year 1992-93. The first appellate authority also upheld the action of the Assessing Officer. On further appeal, the Tribunal held that 50 per cent. of the amount received by the assessee without furnishing security had to be treated as taxable income in the year in which it was withdrawn and excluded the other 50 per cent. of the amount received by the assessee, on furnishing security, from assessment in the year in which it was withdrawn. 4. Similarly, an extent of two acres of land owned by the assessee was acquired by the Government during 1992-93 and a compe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....questions were framed at the behest of the assessee. 7. Question No. 1 : This question is raised at the behest of the Revenue. We fail to understand how could the finding of the Tribunal be faulted. The assessee received the amounts in 1991-92. Admittedly, the amounts were deposited by the assessee, within six months from the date of its receipt, in the UTI Capital Gains Scheme, which is one of the units as specified asset mentioned in Explanation 1(c)(ii) to section 54E of the Act. Therefore, we agree with the view taken by the Tribunal and decide this question in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. 8. Question No. 2 : Coming to the second question whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that 50 per cent. of the amount wi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ars to be the reason why in the stay petition (CMP No. 2849 of 1991), the Government sought for the stay of execution of the decree in so far as it relates to the enhancement of market value beyond Rs. 50 though it resiled from that stand at a later stage." 10. So even if such a stand had been taken by the Government, the Government has resiled from that stand, which makes it abundantly clear that the disputes between the parties were with regard to enhanced compensation. By an interim order, in appeal, the High Court allowed release of 50 per cent. of compensation without security. In our view, till the matter got finally decided by the High Court, the compensation could not be assessed and it could only be assessed in the year in which t....