Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (6) TMI 596

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r MRP based assessment. The CVD on the imported goods were calculated and paid on the basis of MRP. However, at the time of clearance of laptops, the appellant was asked to clear them on transaction value. The appellant cleared the goods as advised by the customs authorities, however, subsequently, preferred a refund claim. The said claim was rejected as not maintainable on the ground that it was filed without challenging the final assessment order vide Order-in-Original dated 6.3.2014. In appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) vide impugned order dated 24.12.2014 upheld the adjudication order. Hence this appeal. 2. Today, when the came up for hearing, Id. counsel Shri Harish Bindumadhavan pointed out that the relevant portions of the Customs Ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is remanded back, the adjudicating authority may be directed to decide the refund claim only after taking into account the final outcome of the said dispute on valuation of the imported goods for CVD purposes. 4. Heard both sides. 5. We find that the judgments cited by the Id. counsel very much support the contentions put forward by the Id, counsel. Following the ratio laid down in the above judgments, in particular, that of the jurisdictional High Court, we hold that the impugned order upholding rejection of the refund claim on the ground that the assessment order has not been challenged, cannot sustain, for which reason it requires to be set aside, which we hereby do. We also note that with reference to the contention made by Id. A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f Section 4A   would not be applicable as M/s. ELCOT are an "Institutional Consumer", as defined in Explanation of Rule 2A(b) of the SWM Rules and, hence, there is no requirement to declare the MRP on the packages of CTVs sold to M/s. ELCOT. 7. In terms of Rule 2A(b) of the SWM Rules, the provision of Chapter Il of these Rules would not apply to the packaged commodities meant for "Industrial Consumer" or "Institutional Consumer". In terms of explanation to this Rule, "Institutional Consumers" means those consumers who buy packaged commodities directly from manufacturers/packers for      service industry like transportation including airways, railways or any other similar service industry and "Indu....