Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (11) TMI 151

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessment year 1990-91 claiming the deduction under section 80HHC and also under section 32AB of the Income-tax Act. The assessment was completed vide order dated March 18, 1993, whereby the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the appellant under section 80HHC on the interpretation of rule 8(1). The full deduction under section 32AB was also disallowed. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant-company approached the Commissioner of Income-tax by preferring an appeal and the appellate authority granted both the reliefs to the appellant, whereupon the Revenue approached the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Guwahati Bench, in I.T.A. No. 22/Gauhati of 1996. The learned Tribunal allowed the appeal of the Income-tax Department and remitted back th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... receipt" and cannot form a part of the profits in the business and accordingly, the interest income was excluded from the gross receipt. The appellate authority did not agree with the assessing authority as regards the application of section 32AB and held that all the incomes of the appellant-company arose in the normal course of carrying on the business of the said company and therefore form a part of the appellant's business income. Although they have been shown and classified under different heads of income, they continue to be income arising out of the business of the company and accordingly, directed the assessing authority to include the interest income, dividend income and other income in the profits of the eligible business income ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssion is made on behalf of the respondents that in the present case, there is nothing to show that the business of investment in shares, lending money for interest and manufacture and sale of the tea business are not common in nature and both the businesses are not intertwined and interlaced as was the case in Apollo Tyres [2002] 255 ITR 273 (SC). The matter was examined by the appellate authority and the following observations are pertinent: "The income from interest is part and parcel of our tea business. The fact that the company's activities gave rise to interest and sundry receipts does not detract from the facts that the company's business remains what it is and has always been i.e., growing, manufacturing and sale of tea. The said a....