2018 (6) TMI 372
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....D.S. Chavan, Supdt. (AR) for Appellant Shri Bharat Raichandani, Advocate for Respondent Per: Raju This appeal has been filed by the Revenue against order of Commissioner (Appeals) setting aside the demand of duty and imposition of penalty. 2. Learned AR pointed out that earlier the matter was remanded by Commissioner (Appeals) on the following grounds: - (i) Commissioner (Appeals) v....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r/Dn.III/R-V/18/AJ/JC/08-09 dt. 15.09.2008 and held that the product RMC during the period 13.02.1998 to 01.06.1998 attracts duty of excise @ 8% adv. which was also confirmed by CBEC Circular No. 368/1/98-CX dt. 06.01.1998 and also held that Precast Cement products, Concrete Blocks falling under CSH 6807.90 are excisable and are not exempted. He argued that instead of deciding the aforesaid poi....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI