AI OCR 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (6) TMI 361
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... share capital of Rs. 57,500/- and share premium of Rs. 1,42,500/-. The assessing officer made an addition u/s 68 of the Act. Aggrieved the assessee carried the matter in appeal. The ld. first appellate authority granted relief and deleted the addition. Aggrieved the revenue is in appeal before us. 3. After hearing rival contentions, we find that the Ld. CIT(A) has allowed ground nos. 1 to 5 of the assessee's appeal before him. From form no. 35 we find that ground no. 1 reads as follows: "1. Without prejudice to the other grounds of appeal, it is bad in law to pass the order u/s 143(3) of the IT Act by the assessing officer in the case of the appellant as the notice u/s 143(2) of the IT Act was served on 01.10.2013 i.e. beyond the statut....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... para 6 and 7 held as follows: "6. In the case of M/s. Sukanya Merchandise Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO (ITA 291/Kol/2016 dated 15.12.2017) cited by the learned counsel for the assessee, a similar view has been taken by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal and the similar issue relating to the addition made under section 68 on account of share capital contribution by treating the same as unexplained cash credits is restored back by the Tribunal to the file of the A.O. in almost similar situation after recording its observations / findings as under: We note that the AO pursuant to the order of Ld. CIT had taken note of the directions of the Ld. CIT and issued notice u/s. 142(1) dated 16.08.2013 and has acknowledged that the assessee had furnished....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ted the enquiry on 16.08.2013 which was complied by the assessee by submitting documents which has been acknowledged by the AO. Thereafter, the enquiry was started only at the fag end of February 2014 and the assessee company had informed the AO that their directors were out of station till 23.03.2014. In the light of the aforesaid facts, we are of the opinion that the assessee did not get fair opportunity to present the evidences before the AO so, there was a lack of opportunity as aforesaid, therefore, it has to go back to AO. 8. We also note that Ld. Cit while setting aside the order of the AO which was passed u/s. 147/143(3) of the Act, the Ld. CIT gave certain guidelines to follow for conducting deep investigation. We also note that....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... source. Since similar order of the Ld. CIT passed u/s. 263 of the Act has been upheld by the Tribunal as well as by the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court as well as the SLP has been dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, similar order of the Ld. CIT has to be given effect to as directed by the Ld. CIT. We take note that the Ld. CIT with his experience and wisdom has given certain guidelines in the backdrop of black money menace should have been properly enquired into as directed by him. The AO ought to have followed the investigating guidelines and method as directed by him to unearth the facts to determine whether the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the share subscribers. We note that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in three judges ben....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... effective inquiry was carried out, particularly in the fact of the allegations of the Revenue that the account statements reveal uniform pattern of cash deposits of equal amounts in the respective accounts preceding the transactions in question. This necessitated a detailed scrutiny of the material submitted by the assessee in response to the notice under Section148 issued by the AO, as also the material submitted at the stage of appeals, if deemed proper by way of making or causing to be made a 'further inquiry' in exercise of the power under Section 250(4). His approach not having been adopted, the impugned order of ITAT, and consequently that of CIT(Appeals), cannot be approved or upheld." In view of the aforesaid order and in th....