2018 (6) TMI 304

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Opposite Party : C.S.C ORDER Heard. Both the contesting parties are represented and they consent to the disposal of this revision. The following questions arise for consideration in this revision: "(a) Whether the Tribunal below ought to have considered the strong prima facie case in favour of the Revisionist in view of the inter-State nature of the transaction, Section 3 of the Central Sa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....2015 in T.T.R. No.47 of 2015 (A.Y. 2011-12) and decision dated 03.05.2015 in T.T.R. No.47 of 2015 (A.Y. 2011-12) and decision dated 30.05.2016 T.T.R. No.70 of 2016 (A.Y. 2012-13), the Tribunal was justified in not granting complete relief to the Revisionist." On a perusal of the impugned order dated 23.5.2018 passed by the Commercial Tax Tribunal the Court finds that the first appeal of the revi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ering the interim relief matters have not been taken into consideration. Neither prima facie case nor balance of convenience nor irreparable loss has been considered. The order has been passed cryptically and mechanically. The other contention raised on behalf of the revisionist is that the merits of the matter is covered by a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in (2014) 7 SCC 1 by which a co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bunal ignoring the said judgment and the decisions of the Supreme Court referred herein. In the case at hand the Court finds that while passing the impugned order the Tribunal has failed to consider the 3 parameters referred in the judgment of this Court in the case of Mrs. Tata Motors Ltd. Furthermore the Court finds that it has taken note of the assertion by the revisionist herein before the Tr....