Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (6) TMI 114

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ineligible due to the reasons that the bill numbers and date were not pre-printed; hired labourers supplied to canteen service for cleaning of utensils are not in relation to manufacture and clearance of final products and they were also used for renovation and setting up the factory; out of pocket expenses in respect of administrative charge in relation to accounting etc are not eligible for 'input services'. 3. Learned C.A. explains the case in detail by producing a chart wherein he indicated that the allegations were arising out of an audit conducted by the authorities in the factory of the appellant, but according to him appellant is Government of India undertaking. He explains that in the bill, in the case in hand, three issues arise....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....NVAT Credit to the appellant on this ground is incorrect. Another issue in this case is regarding supply of manpower which was utilized in the canteen of the appellant. I find that there is no dispute that the supply of manpower was in the factory premises of the appellant and he had deployed few work man in the canteen which is within the factory premises. In my view, for this reason the CENVAT credit cannot be denied to the appellant. Accordingly, I set aside the impugned order to that extent and allow the CENVAT Credit involved in the following chart:- Sl.No. Amount involved Allegation in SCN/A.R 1. 1,10,212 Bill No. & Date not Printed 2. 5,68,775 Bill No. & date not printed and labour supply to canteen service 3. 6599 Bill N....