Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (11) TMI 1720

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... case, the appellate order passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) is illegal being against the principles of natural justice ad against the provisions of IT Act, 1961. 2. The ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) has grossly erred on facts as well as in law in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 458112/- under Rule 8D read with section 14A of the IT Act." 3. Apropos these grounds, we have heard rival arguments of both the parties and carefully perused the record and paper book filed by the assessee spread over 31 pages. On behalf of the assessee, the ld. assessee's representative has submitted a brief synopsis of submissions and citations relied by the assessee. The ld. AR submitted that the Assessing Officer made disallowan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the AY 2008-09 dated 16.1.2013 wherein it has been held:- "Qua merits, we find much force in the assessee's argument that 'share application money', to the extent it is actually so, so that it only represents amounts paid by way of application for allotment of shares, the same cannot be regarded as an investment in shares, or an asset (or asset class) yielding tax-free income, and neither is it capable of yielding any tax-free income. The same would, therefore, in our clear view, have to be excluded in working out the disallowance ulr. 8D. Further, though the Revenue has not disputed the sums reflected as 'share application money' in the assessee's balance-sheet, the AO, to whom the matter is to be in any case....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llowed a proper procedure prescribed in the statutory provisions of the Act for making disallowance u/s 14A of the Act r/w Rules 8D of the Income Tax Rules. 7. Replying to the above, the ld. DR submitted that the Assessing Officer has dealt with the situation where the assessee is carrying on one individual business and the expenditure incurred by the assessee is related to the taxable and tax exempt income. The DR further contended that in such a situation, applying the principle of apportionment of expenditure, the expenditure attributable to the income which is tax exempt has to be allowed. The DR pointed out observations and findings of the Assessing Officer and submitted that since the assessee has stated in his letter that no expen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he assessee with regard to the expenditure or no expenditure, as the case may be, in relation to exempt income, the AO would have to indicate cogent reasons for the same." 9. We also take cognizance of the judgment of ITAT 'D' Bench Mumbai in the case of Rainy Investments Pvt. Ltd. (supra). It has been held that the share application money cannot be regarded as an investment in shares or an asset yielding tax free income and neither it is capable of yielding any tax free income. In the present case, the Assessing Officer has ignored above legal proposition while making disallowance u/s 14A of the Act r/w 8D of the Rules. During the first appellate proceedings, the Commissioner of Income Tax(A) has examined the claim of the assessee but h....