Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1996 (9) TMI 637

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... completed under section 143(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') on 23-1-1976 in the status of 'HUF'. On 10-1-1978, a notice was served on Trilochand under section 148 of the Act. The assessee filed fresh return on 4-2-1982 in the status of HUF repeating the same income as was mentioned earlier. On 26-3-1985, assessment was made under section 143(3) on the basis of fresh return. Aggrieved, the assessee filed the appeal before the AAC which was dismissed. The assessee then filed appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee impugned the order as invalid on the ground that notice under section 148 was not served on proper person. The Tribunal accepted the contention and set aside the assessment. The application was rejected. The applicant-r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the question as extracted below : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally right in holding that the reassessment of the assessment year 1976-77 was invalid and without jurisdiction ?" 3. We have heard Shri Anand Mohan Mathur, the learned senior counsel with Shri A. Shrivastava, for the applicant and Shri P.M. Chaudhary, the learned counsel for the non-applicant. 4. We notice that before the Tribunal, the applicant-revenue had raised as many as three questions, but in these cases, only one question (which was question No. 1 before the Tribunal) is proposed and projected. 5. During submission, it was contended that the Tribunal was not justified in entertaining the additional ground o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....held that the conclusion based on appreciation of facts does not give rise to any question of law. 10. It is not disputed before us that there must be proper reasons for reopening of the assessment proceedings, in ITO v. Shri Biju Patnaik AIR 1991 SC 464, it is held as under : "Section 147(a) postulates two conditions, namely, that the Income-tax Officer must, on the basis of material facts on record, prima facie, to be satisfied that the income of the assessee is exigible to tax for the relevant assessment year and that he had reason to believe that it had escaped assessment. He must have reason to believe that the escapement of income was on account of the omission or failure on the part of the assessee to fully and truly disclose a....