2017 (5) TMI 1565
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hakur, Sr. DR ORDER Per Bhavnesh Saini, Judicial Member This appeal by the assessee has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-1, Gurgaon dated 30th November, 2016 for assessment. Year 2012-13 challenging the disallowance of Rs. 49,81,831/- on account of non deduction of TDS u/s 40 (a) (ia) of the I.T. Act. 2. The Assessing Officer noted the during the year assessee is running p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d 29th January, 2016 in which in para 6.1 and 7, the appeal of the assessee has been partly allowed on this issue. The same paras are reproduced as under :- "6.1 Recently in the matter of P.M.S. Diesels 2015 59 taxmann.com 100 (Punjab & Haryana), Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court had elaborately discussed the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court and Hon'ble Gujarat H....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d as a deduction in computing the income of previous year, and further, section 40(a)(ia) has been substituted wherein the 30% of any sum payable to a resident has been substituted. In the present case, the authorities below has added the entire sum of Rs. 7,51,322/- by disallowing the whole of the amount. Though the substitution in section 40 has been made effective with effect from 1.4.2015, in ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... disallowance may be restricted to 30% of the total disallowance. On the other hand Ld. DR relied upon orders of the authorities below. 6. We have considered rival submissions and find that issue is covered in favour of the assessee by order of ITAT Jaipur Bench in the case of Shri Rajendra Yadav vs. ITO and Smt. Sonu Khandelwal vs. ITO. In these orders it was held that the disallowance u/s 40(....


TaxTMI