Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 1455

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tered with the Central Excise Department during the months of July 2008 to October 2008, they cleared PVC pipes for use in drinking water supply project without payment of duty in terms of Notification No. 6/2006-CE dated 1.3.2006. Periodical show cause notices were issued proposing to deny the benefit of notification alleging that the supplies made to the contractor is not eligible for exemption for the reason that from the certificate issued by the relevant authority, it is not clear whether the pipes are used to draw water from the source to storage reservoir or as a part of integral water supply project. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand, interest and imposed penalties. In appeal, Commissioner (Appeal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mar river / source to treatment plant and then to storage reservoirs. It is not necessary to establish the diameter of the pipes used by the appellant and the appellant has complied with Sl. No. 2 of Sl. No. 7 of the notification. A revised certificate dated 21.10.2008 issued by the District Magistrate would also show that the pipes were used from the Krishna River / source to treatment plant at Yalparatti and from there to storage reservoirs. The benefit has been denied by wrongly interpreting the application of notification and also without considering the certificates produced by the appellant. He prayed that the demand may be set aside. 4. The ld. AR Shri R. Subramaniam supported the findings in the impugned order. 5. Heard both s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he certificate produced by the appellant dated 19.11.2008 issued by the District Magistrate reads as under:- "As such on the basis of report of the Executive Engineer, P.R.E. Division, Yadgir, it is hereby certified that the materials detailed in the Annexure to this certificate are intended to be used for pumping of raw water from Bhima river to treatment plant and there to storage reservoirs at Anur -K and8 other villages in Yadgir Taluk, dist: Gulbarga." 8. Further, the revised certificate dated 21.10.2008 also reads as under:- "This is to certify, that the said materials are required for pumping raw water from Krishna river to treatment plant at Yalparatti and from there to storage reservoirs at Khemalapur and other....