Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 1449

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....missioner(AR)- For the Respondent Order Per : S.S Garg The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dt. 17/05/2012 passed by the Commissioner(AppeaIs) whereby the Commissioner(Appeals) upheld the Order-in-Original and rejected the appeal.          2. Briefly, the facts of the present case are that the appellants are the manufacturers of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... interest on the differential duty collected and paid amounting to Rs. 22,774/- The Department issued show-cause notice dt. 13/09/2010 demanding differential duty amounting to Rs. 1,19,592/- along with interest (for September 2008, October 2008 and December 2008) and also demanded interest amount of Rs. 22,774/- on the differential duty paid during the period from 2005-06 to 2009-10 and proposed t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... supplementary invoice with the rate of the duty prevalent at that point of time. He further submitted that there is no suppression of facts and the appellant cleared the goods under a bona fide belief. Further the appellant had reversed the proportionate credit along with interest on 13/06/2012. 5. After considering the submissions of both parties, I find that the impugned order alleging suppres....