Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 1442

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....val for Mrs Kalpanak Raval, Advocates ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Petitioner has challenged action of the Commissioner of Income-tax in dismissing the petitioner's appeal without hearing the petitioner, as also the action of the Revenue authorities in directing recovery of a sum of Rs. 2,14,50,000/= from the petitioner's bank account in Bank of India, Surat. For AY ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 5 5,00,000/= 15th October 2016 6  5,00,000/= 15th November 2016 7  5,12,527/= 15th December 2016   TOTAL Rs. 37,12,527/= It is also not in dispute that the petitioner had deposited an amount Rs. 32 lakhs, out of Rs. 37,12,527/= demanded by the Assessing Officer within the time frame. The remaining amount of Rs. 5,12,527/= was also deposited, but on 27th February 2018.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... First of all, we had ascertained from the counsel for the Revenue whether the petitioner's contention regarding the appeal being disposed of by the Appellate Commissioner without service of notice was correct. He was unable to dispute this fact. Under the circumstances, the appellate order must be set-aside. The appeal must be placed back before the Appellate Commissioner for fresh disposal in a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Government agency to carry out coercive recovery, would not permit such an authority to access individual's bank account, even without his knowledge. If the concerned authorities are concerned about assessee withdrawing the amount and making recovery impossible or even difficult, the power of attachment of the Bank accounts and other immovable properties can always be exercised. Withdrawal of th....