Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 1400

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e eligible to avail exemption on first clearance of 3500 MTs of paper as per Notification No.4/2006-CE dt.1.3.2006. Accordingly, the assessee had opted to avail the exemption with effect from 1.4.2008. The assessee had removed 150.150 MTs of writing paper and printing paper valued at Rs. 57,01.486/-, over and above the aforesaid exempted quantity of 3500 MTs without payment of Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 4,69,802/- which was sought to be recovered. Therefore, the proceedings were initiated against the assessee vide show cause notice dt.30.9.2009. The assessee had cleared a quantity of 150.150 on payment of duty MT by availing the exemption of 3500 MTs. It was proposed in the SCN that this quantity of paper be included in the total ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion is in respect of only certain varieties of paper and does not cover other varieties of paper. There is no warrant to take in other varieties of paper. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the learned Commissioner was in error in holding that the quantity restriction was to be computed taking into account clearances of all varieties of paper manufactured by the appellant. We say so for another reason also. If the exemption is read as applicable to the clearance of all varieties of paper, it yields all unintended results. Either excluded varieties of paper also get the benefit of the exemption on the ground that they were the "first clearances" or the included varieties are denied the exemption (as in the present case) merely on the gro....