TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2001 (11) TMI 72
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that the basis of intervention by the Commissioner should be part of the records in the assessment proceedings of the assessee and the statements in the search operations regarding the son of the assessee could not be considered as forming part of assessment-of the assessee and thus the action was invalid?" The facts giving rise to these references are as under: Vallabhdas Vithaldas, the respondent in Income-tax Reference No. 65 of 1988 is an individual whose assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Act on February 19, 1985. The respondent in Income-tax Reference No. 66 of 1988-Mrs. Savitaben is the wife of Vallabhdas Vithaldas. Her assessment was completed under section 143(1....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ions in the case of the respondent-assessees' son did not form part of the records of the respective respondent-assessees' assessments and, therefore, they could not form the basis of an action under section 263 of the Act in so far as the respondent-assessees were concerned. The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Ganga Properties v. ITO [1979] 118 ITR 447 and held that the statements in question did not form part of the records of the respondent-assessees and, therefore, the Commissioner could not have invoked the power of revision under section 263 of the Act on the basis of such statements. Hence, these references at the instance of the Revenue. We have heard Mr. B. B. Naik, learned counsel for t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bunal, we find that the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee only on the ground that the search and seizure operations regarding the assessees' son did not form part of the record of the assessment and, therefore, they cannot form the basis of an action under section 263 regarding the respondent-assessees. For this purpose, the Tribunal relied on the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Ganga Properties v. ITO [1979] 118 ITR 447. The Tribunal observed that the word "therein" is an obvious reference to the record of the proceedings and, therefore, it is necessary that the basis of intervention by the Commissioner should be part of the records in the assessment proceedings of the assessee. The Tribunal further observed th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....any proceedings under the concerned direct tax laws available at the time of examination by the Commissioner. Even thereafter a doubt was raised and some of the appellate authorities took the view that the Explanation inserted by the Finance Act, 1988, was applicable to the orders which are passed by the Commissioner after June 1, 1988, when the Finance Act, 1988, came into force. The Legislature again stepped in through the Finance Act, 1989, so as to clarify that the provisions of the Explanation to section 263(1) shall be deemed to have always been in existence. After considering the aforesaid legislative history, the apex court has interpreted the word "record" in section 263(1) in the following words: "The revisional power conferred....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ations of the apex court clearly give the widest meaning to the word "record". It is also pertinent to note that while section 263(1) uses the word "record", the Explanation goes further and states that the record includes all records relating to any proceeding under this Act. The use of the plural 'records' and 'relating to any proceeding under this Act' do not permit any -limitation being placed on the power of the Commissioner that the power under section 263(1) can be exercised only on the basis of the statements which are recorded in the course of search and seizure operations in respect of the very assessee and not in respect of any other person. The apex court has in terms overruled the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Ganga Pr....