2018 (5) TMI 1216

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Authorised Representative for Appellant Shri Mohammad Altaf, Assistant, Commissioner (AR), for Respondent Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The present appeal is arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. NOI/SVTAX/000/APPL-I/131-A/14-15 dated 11/02/2015 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-I), Meerut. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants were receiving services of Bandwi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of Finance Act, 1994. On contest, the issue was adjudicated through Order-in-Original dated 30.12.2013 wherein the demands were confirmed, proposed amounts were appropriated and equal amount of penalty under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994 was imposed. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant preferred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The learned Commissioner (Appeals) decided the appeal t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ause notice along with appropriate interest. Further, reverse charge service tax on Bandwidth Charges was also paid by them along with interest before issuance of show cause notice. Therefore, the issue of show cause notice was not authorized under the provisions of Sub-section (3) of Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994. Therefore, imposition of penalty is not sustainable. 4. Heard the learned A.R.....