Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2001 (9) TMI 68

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....84. While counsel for the assessee contended that the law laid down by this court in the case of CIT v. Sivanandha Steels Ltd. [2000] 243 ITR 770 applies to the facts of this case, learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that it is the law laid down by the apex court in the case of Aravinda Paramila Works v. CIT [1999] 237 ITR 284 that is applicable. In the decision of this court in CIT v. Siva....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l that was asserted by the assessee was that he had paid one per cent. commission to the agents abroad, who had procured orders. That commission was paid on the sales effected in the countries in which those agents had functioned. In the decision of this court in [2000] 243 ITR 770 as also in the judgment of the apex court in Aravinda Paramila Works v. CIT [1999] 237 ITR 284, it has been laid down....