Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (9) TMI 68

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HA BABU J.-The assessment year is 1983-84. While counsel for the assessee contended that the law laid down by this court in the case of CIT v. Sivanandha Steels Ltd. [2000] 243 ITR 770 applies to the facts of this case, learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that it is the law laid down by the apex court in the case of Aravinda Paramila Works v. CIT [1999] 237 ITR 284 that is applicable. In ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of the agent abroad. In this case, all that was asserted by the assessee was that he had paid one per cent. commission to the agents abroad, who had procured orders. That commission was paid on the sales effected in the countries in which those agents had functioned. In the decision of this court in [2000] 243 ITR 770 as also in the judgment of the apex court in Aravinda Paramila Works v. CIT....