Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 939

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er M.Balaganesh, AM 1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -24, Kolkata [in short the ld CITA] in Appeal No. 174/CIT(A)- 24/Kol/2012-13 dated 9.5.2016 against the order passed by the JCIT (TDS) Range -58, Kolkata [in short the ld AO] levying penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....level best to overcome the Software oriented problems, yet because of the lack of knowledge regarding the new Modules, the assessee could not collect the required reports of its agents and surveyors to whom commission had been paid. It was submitted before the ld AO that though the taxes deducted at source had been duly deposited to the credit of the Central Government within the prescribed dates,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on the following grounds:- 1. That the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) was wrong in confirming the penalty of Rs. 94,200/- imposed by the Assessing Officer u/s 272A(2)(k)/274. 2. That without prejudice to the contention raised in Ground No. 1 above, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was wrong in not appreciating the fact that there had been reasonable cause for the de....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ime for addressing the same. The assessee in the instant case had to undergo the same problems from October 2009 onwards , which had been duly stated by the senior branch manager of , Serampore Branch, vide letter dated 11.11.2011 , which fact is also acknowledged in the order of the ld CITA. The due date of filing the quarterly statement for the second quarter of financial year 2009-10 falls in O....