2018 (5) TMI 886

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that they were showing some amount as "other income‟ and on being pointed out by the Revenue they paid Service Tax amounting to Rs. 15,31,000/- on the same under the Head/Account of "Business Auxiliary Services‟. The said payment was paid by the appellant vide TR-6 Challans on 30/11/2006. 2. Subsequently, the appellant took the credit of the same in their Cenvat credit accounts on 31/10/2007 on the ground that the "other income‟ shown in the records belonged to the Transportation Activities and as such the Service Tax was to be paid under the category of "Transport of Goods by Road Services". Instead the same was wrongly deposited under the head of "Business Auxiliary Services". It was their contention that in as much ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x was required to be paid under the category of "Transport of Goods by Road Services", which is a Cenvatable input service. Accordingly, they took the Cenvat credit of the amount paid by them. 6. The dispute essentially relates to the fact that as to whether the "other income‟ shown by the appellant was taxable under the category of "Business Auxiliary Services" or "Transportation of Goods Services". Admittedly, Revenue has also not shown any detailed evidences to reflect upon the fact that the said "other income‟ was taxable under the category of "Business Auxiliary Services". There is nothing on record to show that the appellant has provided the services under the said category. Merely because the appellant agree to pay Ser....