AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (5) TMI 825
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppellant : Mr.A.K. Batra, CA And Ms. Vibha Nagang, Advocate Present for the Respondent: Mr.G.R. Singh, D.R. PER: S.K. MOHANTY This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 31.03.2014 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Delhi. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in export of garments and realise the sale proceeds of such exported ite....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t of service, should liable to pay Service Tax in terms of Section 66A of the Act, under reverse charge mechanism. 3. Heard both sides. 4. We find that the issue arising out of present dispute is no more res-integra, in view of the decision of this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Dileep Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur - 2017 (10) TMI 1231 - CESTAT, New Delhi. The relevant paragraphs in the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....before the Tribunal in the case of Greenply Industries Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur (Final Order No. 50149/2014 dated 03.01.2014) where it was observed that:- "4. We find that no documents have been produced showing that foreign bank has charged any amount from the appellant directly. The facts as narrated in the impugned order clearly indicate that it is the ING Vyasa Bank who had paid the charges to ....