2018 (5) TMI 696
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d Sri Anand Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.C. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel. Petitioner is a transporter and is challenging the seizure order dated 19.03.2018 and the consequential notice for levied of penalty dated 29.03.2018 issued under Section 129(3) of the UPGST Act, 2017. Brief facts of the case are that the goods and vehicle was intercepted by the responden....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the transit declaration form is not required for the transportation of goods under the inter-state transaction but on insistence by the respondent no. 4 the person in-charge of the vehicle has downloaded the TDF-I on 22.03.2018 i.e. before the seizure proceedings are completed. However the penalty notice is also issued. Against the seizure....