Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 281

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The petitioner is a registered dealer on the file of the respondent under the provisions of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. 3. Consequent to an inspection conducted by the officials of the Enforcement Wing in the business premises of the petitioner, the respondent issued notices dated 03.1.2017 for all the relevant assessment years namely 2011-12 to 2014-15, pursuant to which, a proposal was submitted by the Assistant Commissioner (CT) (Enforcement), Kumbakonam dated 07.10.2016. The respondent - Assessing Officer, by referring to the proposals of the officials of the Enforcement Wing, stated that the defects have been noticed during the course of inspection and he proposed to revise the assessment for all the years, which were com....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f accounts of the petitioner. 6. Per contra, the learned Additional Government Pleader submits that the impugned orders being appealable orders, the petitioner has to prefer appeals and that the writ petitions need not be entertained. The learned Additional Government Pleader further submits that the admission made by the petitioner before the Inspecting Authorities is binding on the petitioner, that they cannot approbate and reprobate and that therefore, the objections were rejected. In support of his contention, he referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of Yousuff Radio Vs. Board of Revenue [reported in (1979) Vol.43 STC 525]. 7. This Court has carefully considered the submissions made o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nch of this Court that the courses of taxation under the Income Tax Act and the Sales Tax Act are entirely different, as, in the former, the income of the dealer is assessed to tax and is quantified by the Income Tax Officer in accordance with the provisions of that Act and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 ordains the Assessing Authorities functioning thereunder to bring to tax sales as such either found in the books of accounts or agreed to be so by the assessee or otherwise proved to be so by circumstantial evidence. Thus, by analyzing the manner, in which, two Statutes operate, the Hon'ble Division Bench held in favour of the Revenue stating that the assessee admitted in his sworn statement that the two sums representing th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....shable on facts and the decision in the case of Madras Granites Private Limited applies to the facts of this case with full force. These are sufficient grounds to set aside the impugned assessment orders. 13. Apart from that, the respondent ignored the circular issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes dated 11.8.2015 in Circular No.29/2015. In the said circular, directions have been issued as to how to treat discounts and incentives received post purchase as sales turnover and the Assessing Officers were directed to verify a random sample of sale invoices and corresponding purchase invoices for certain period and if such random verification reveals that the dealer sold the goods lesser than the purchase value, a thorough scrutiny f....