1980 (10) TMI 206
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d an exparte decree was passed against it on April 9, 1973. The corporation applied for setting aside the ex parte decree on February 2, 1974. which was resisted by the respondents. It is not disputed that the Corporation came to know about the ex parte decree on January 3, 1974 when Summons for the execution of the above decree was received by it. 2. The trial Court framed the following three ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... to lack of jurisdiction of the two Courts below, the present Revision Petition is incompetent as this Court was not called upon to assess question of fact or law which may even have been decided wrongly. In this behalf, reference is made to D. L. F. Housing and Construction Co. (P) Ltd. v. Sarup Singh, AIR 1971 SC 2324. Indeed, Section 115, Code of Civil Procedure, as amended, provides that the H....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....conduct the case on behalf of the Corporation the learned counsel for the Petitioner has referred to the provisions of Order XXIX, Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure, which prescribe that I suits by or against a corporation any pleading may be signed and verified on behalf of the corporation by the secretary or by any director or other principal officer of the corporation who is able to depose to the....


TaxTMI