TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1980 (10) TMI 206
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gainst it on April 9, 1973. The corporation applied for setting aside the ex parte decree on February 2, 1974. which was resisted by the respondents. It is not disputed that the Corporation came to know about the ex parte decree on January 3, 1974 when Summons for the execution of the above decree was received by it. 2. The trial Court framed the following three issues to decide the matter: (1)....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....esent Revision Petition is incompetent as this Court was not called upon to assess question of fact or law which may even have been decided wrongly. In this behalf, reference is made to D. L. F. Housing and Construction Co. (P) Ltd. v. Sarup Singh, AIR 1971 SC 2324. Indeed, Section 115, Code of Civil Procedure, as amended, provides that the High Court shall not vary or reverse any order made in co....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....counsel for the Petitioner has referred to the provisions of Order XXIX, Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure, which prescribe that I suits by or against a corporation any pleading may be signed and verified on behalf of the corporation by the secretary or by any director or other principal officer of the corporation who is able to depose to the facts of the case. This provision nowhere empowers such a....