2018 (5) TMI 32

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Per: Dr. D. M. Misra Heard both sides. 2. This is an appeal filed against the order-in-appeal No. AHM-EXCUS-001-APP-031-2017-18 dated 25.07.2017 passed by Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise, Ahmedabad. 3. The short issue involved in the present appeal is: whether the appellant are required to pay/discharge interest on the service tax amount of Rs. 8,71,467/- already paid and also ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ference amount was paid after being pointed by the audit, therefore, interest is payable and also penalty under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1944, is attracted. 6. I find that there is no dispute of the fact that the appellant paid less duty during the period 2010-2011 to 2012-2013 to the extent of Rs. 8,71,467/- which was pointed out by the audit officers on scrutiny of the relevant entries in t....