2017 (4) TMI 1345

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dent. JUDGMENT [Judgment per : Rajiv Shakdher, J.]. - This is an appeal, which is directed against the judgment and order dated 1-7-2008, passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short, the Tribunal) [2009 (234) E.L.T. 166 (Tribunal)]. 2. By virtue of the impugned judgment and order, the Tribunal returned two findings, in favour of the assessee i.e., the first r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nding, returned by the Tribunal, with regard to the unjust enrichment, approached this Court by way of the instant appeal. 3.1 The appeal was predicted on the decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of : Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow v. Kesar Enterprises Ltd., 2006 (197) E.L.T. 317 (S.C.). 4. The contention of the Revenue was that the principles of unjust enrichment was v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Supreme Court in Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow v. Kesar Enterprises Ltd., the second direction issued by the Tribunal cannot be sustained and therefore, the judgment in this matter, needs to be remanded to the Tribunal, for adjudication, on merits. 6. Mr. P.R. Ranganathan, who appears for the assessee/first respondent cannot, but, submit that on account of the aforementioned judg....