TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (4) TMI 1178
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....al credit society, registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. For the assessment years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, the assessee had claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act amounting to Rs. 1,04,53,398 and Rs. 3,37,43,805, respectively. The assessments were completed by denying the claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act. The Assessing Officer concluded that since the assessee was doing the business of banking, it was not entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2) of the I.T.Act in view of insertion of section 80P(4) of the I.T.Act, with effect from 01.04.2007. 3.2 Aggrieved by the assessment completed by denying the deduction u/s 80P(2) of the I.T.Act, the assessee preferred an appeal to the first appellate authority. The CIT(A) following the judgment of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of The Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Others vs. CIT [(2016) 384 ITR 490 (Ker.)] held that the assessees is entitled to the benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2) of the I.T.Act. 3.3 The Revenue being aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A) in granting deduction u/s 80P(2) of the I.T.Act, has raised the issue in appeals for assessment years 2012-2013 and 201....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n para 17 page 14 of the judgment that when a primary agricultural credit Society is registered as such under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, such society is entitled to the benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Income-tax Act. The Hon'ble High Court was considering the following substantial question of law: "a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case under consideration/ the Tribunal is correct in law in deciding against the assessee/ the issue regarding entitlement for exemption under section 8OP, ignoring the fact that the assessee is a primary agricultural credit society?" 8.1 In considering the above question of law, the Hon'ble High Court rendered the following findings: "15. Appellants in these different appeals are indisputably societies registered under the Kerala Cooperative societies Act 1969, for short, KCS Act and the bye-laws of each of them, as made available to this court as part of the paper books, clearly show that they have been classified as primary agricultural credit societies by the competent authority under the provisions of that Act The parliament, having defined the term 'cooperative society' for the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... In the light of the aforesaid, we answer substantial question: 'A' in favour of the appellants and hold that the Tribunal erred in law in deciding the issue regarding the entitlement of exemption under section 8OP against the appellants. We hold that the primary agricultural credit societies, registered as such under the KCS Act; and classified so, under that Act including the appellants are entitled to such exemption." 8.2 In the instant case, the assessee's are all primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969. The certificate has been issued by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies to the above said effect and the same is on record. The Hon'ble High Court, in the case cited supra, had held that primary agricultural credit society, registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, 1969, is entitled to the benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2). Since there is a certificate issued by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, stating that the assessee is a primary agricultural credit society, going by the judgment of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court, assessee is entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2). However, the Revenue's ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ory of person (as they were not members as per the provisions referred). The Apex Court in para 25 of the Judgment has pointed out that the main reason for disentitling the assessee from getting the deduction provided under section 80 P of the Act is not sub-section (4) of the Act. On the contrary, the Hon'ble Apex Court held that the Credit Co-operative Society was not entitled for deduction u/s 8OP of the Act for the reason of categorical finding of the A.O. that the activities of the assessee are in violation of the Provisions of the MACSA under which it is formed as the substantial deposits were from 'nominal members' who are actually non-members as per the provisions of law referred. The Hon'ble Apex Court specifically took note of the fact that the assessee therein has carved out a category of 'nominal members' who are infact not the members in the real-sense. Therefore the deposits received from the carved out category viz nominal members who are not the members as per the provisions of the law referred to therein and without the permission of the Registrar of Societies was held to be violative of the provisions and were treated/ proceeded with as deposit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....0P(2)(a)(i) of the Act in the light of the definition of that expression as contained in Section 2(n) of the Co-operative Societies Act." 9.7 The Bombay High Court in Jalgaon District Central v. UOI (2004) 265 ITR 423 (Bom) in the light of the above Supreme Court judgment had held that nominal member is also member under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act and entitled for benefits under section 8OP. [Para 17 to 20 of the judgment], as under:- "17. In case of M/s U. P. Co-op. Cane Union Federation Ltd., Lucknow (cited supra), the Supreme Court has held that the expression "Member" is not defined in the Income Tax Act. Since the Co-operative Society has to be established under the provisions of law made by the State Legislature in that regard, the expression "Member" in Section 80P(2)(a)(i) must, therefore, be construed in the context of the provisions of law enacted by the State Legislature under which the co-operative society claiming exemption has been formed. The Supreme Court has further observed that it is necessary to construe the expression "Member" in Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act in the light of the definition of "Member" given under Section 2(n) of the U.P.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f such letter from RBI are placed on record). 9.9 That being the case, the assessing officer was not competent and did not possess the jurisdiction to resolve / decide the issue as to whether the assessee was a 'Primary Agricultural Credit Society' or a 'Co-operative bank', within the meaning assigned to it under the provisions of the Banking Regulation Act and to take a contrary view especially in view of the Explanation provided after the clause (ccvi) of section 5 r.w.s Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act. 9.10 In view of the aforesaid reasoning, I hold that the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. is not applicable to the facts of the present case. According to me, the judgment of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court is identical to the facts of the present cases and is squarely applicable. Therefore, I hold that the CIT(A) has correctly allowed the claim of deduction in the above cases and I uphold the orders of the CIT(A). It is ordered accordingly. 10. In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed." 7.1 The facts of the instant cases are identical to the facts considered by the Tribunal in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... F.1233, Head Office, Payangadi Kannur-670303 and vide letter No. UBD(T) No.440/12-01-008/2013-14 dated 25/10/2013, The Kadirur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. No.F 1262 HO - Kadirur, Kannur-670 642 that an institution registered as a Primary Agricultural Credit Society (PACS) is not entitled to obtaining a Banking License, which implies that an entity which is registered as a Primary Agricultural Credit Society cannot be a Bank. A copy of said letter is on record. 7.5 In the additional grounds of appeal, the Revenue has placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sabarkantha Zilla Kharid Vechan Sangh Ltd. vs. CIT reported in 203 ITR 1027 (SC). In the case of Sabarkantha Zilla Kharid Vechan Sangh Ltd. (supra), the assessee-society was effecting sales of agricultural inputs of both members as well as non members. The assessee claimed share of the gross profit out of the transactions with members as a deduction from the combined net profit. On the contrary, in the instant case, the assessee had extended credit facilities only to the members. The Revenue does not have a case that such credit facilities are extended to the outsiders. Therefore the income....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er explanation to section 80P that (a) "co-operative bank" and "primary agricultural credit society" shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949) and accordingly "co-operative bank" means a state co-operative bank, a central cooperative bank and a primary co-operative bank. Hence the distinction is evident and the intention- is specific so that the receipt become deductible under section 80P(2)(d) only when it is from another cooperative society and not from banks. In view of the above the interest income of Rs. 2,33,750 is assessed under income from sources and no deduction under section 80P is allowed thereon." 4.1 Aggrieved by the order of the assessment in denying the benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2), the assessee preferred an appeal to the first appellate authority. The CIT(A) held that the assessee had earned interest income of Rs. 2,33,750 in the course of its banking business and the same would fall within the ambit of section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act. In taking the above decision, the CIT(A) relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CIT v. Karnataka State Cooperative Apex Bank [25....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the eligibility for deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Income-tax Act. The Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Sri Biluru Gurubasava Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamamitha vs ITO has clearly answered the issue. The Hon'ble High Court, after considering the amendment introduced by Finance Act 2006 w.e.f 1.4.2007 (insertion of section 80P(4) of the income-tax Act, had rendered the following findings: "Therefore, the intention of the legislature is clear. If a cooperative bank is exclusively carrying on banking business, then the income derived from the said business cannot be deducted in computing the total income of the assessee. The said income is liable for tax. A Cooperative bank as defined under the Banking Regulation Act includes the primary agricultural credit society or a primary cooperative agricultural and rural development bank. The Legislature did not want to deny the said benefits to a primary agricultural credit society or a primary cooperative agricultural and rural development bank. They did not want to extend the said benefit to a Co-operative bank which is exclusively carrying on banking business i.e. the purport of this amendment. Therefore, as the assessee is....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....heet and therefore, to that extent interest income cannot be attributable neither to the activity mentioned in section 80P(2)(a)(i) or u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the Act. This distinguishable feature has been taken note by the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd in ITA No.307 of 2014 ( judgment dated 28th Oct 2014). The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court was considering the following substantial question of law: "Whether the Tribunal failed in law to appreciate that the interest earned on short term deposits were only investment in the course of activity or providing credit facilities to members and that the same cannot be considered as investment made for the purpose of earning interest income and consequently passed a perverse order?" 7.3 In answering the above question of law, the Hon'ble Karntaka High Court distinguished the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Totgars Cooperative Sales Society Ltd (supra) and rendered the following findings: "9. In this context when we look at the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of M/s Totgars Cooperative Sales society Ltd., on which reliance is placed, the Supreme Court was dea....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ur of the assessee. The relevant finding of the Cochin Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Kizhathadiyoor Service Cooperative Bank (supra) in ITA No. 525/Coch/2014, read as follows: 7.2 As regards the interest from treasury and banks, we find on identical facts, the Cochin Bench of the Tribunal in the case of the Muttom Service Cooperative Bank Ltd in ITA No. 372/Coch/2010 had decided the matter in favour of the assessee. The Cochin Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Muttom Service Cooperative Bank Ltd (supra) has distinguished the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Totgar's Cooperative Sale Society Ltd (supra). The relevant finding of the coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of the Muttom Service Cooperative Bank Ltd (supra) read as follows: "5. We have considered the rival submission on either side and also perused the material available on record. We have also carefully gone through the order of the lower authority. No doubt, the latest judgment in Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd vs ITO (supra), the Apex court found that the deposit of surplus funds by the co-operative society is not eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2). In the case before the....