2018 (4) TMI 1171

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt Commissioner (AR) for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil Choudhary The present appeal is directed by the appellant against Order-in-Appeal No. 379-ST/APPL-ALLD/LRO/2016 dated 13/05/2016 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Varanasi. 2.  The brief facts of the case are that the appellant was providing vehicle to M/s UPSRTC. Revenue collected information from M/s UPSRTC about the am....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... service tax. The issue was adjudicated through Order-in-Original dated 02.04.2014 wherein the original authority dropped the proceedings against the appellant. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant preferred appeal before Commissioner (Appeals). The Learned Commissioner (Appeals) has examined Explanation "B" of Notification No.6/2005-ST dated 01.03.2005 and held that while arriving at the aggreg....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on of consideration received towards providing service which are exempt from whole of service tax leviable thereon. On perusal of the said Notifications No.9/2004 and No. 1/2006-ST, I find that 60% of the consideration received is exempted from the whole of the service tax leviable thereon. Therefore, I find that for the purpose of calculation of aggregate value as per said explanation "B", 60% of....