Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (4) TMI 1023

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri S.J. Sahoo, Asstte Commissioner (AR) for respondent Per: Ramesh Nair The issue involved is that whether 50% advertisement expenses borne by dealer with reference to sale of the finished goods by the appellant should be included in the assessable value or otherwise. 2. Shri Shailesh P. Seth, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that this issue is no longer res....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... value of the goods supplied by the manufacturer. From the facts, it is clear that the 50% advertisement expenses are borne by the dealer. Since this amount is not flowing to the manufacturer, it cannot be said that there is an extra consideration; therefore, there is no question of inclusion of any amount, which is not flowing to the appellant. This issue has time and again been tested and finall....