2018 (4) TMI 960

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant : Shri Ranjeet K. Ranjan, Advocate For The Respondent : Shri P.Juneja, AR ORDER Per B. Ravichandran: The only point of dispute in the present appeal is service tax liability of the appellant with reference to construction of the guest house for M/s. Aditya Cement. The impugned order held that the appellant is liable to service tax under "Industrial or Commercial Construction Ser....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x holding that the said guest house cannot be considered as a building used for commerce or industry. However, on appeal, the impugned order reversed the decision and held against the appellant. We have perused the impugned order. 6. The sole reason recorded in the impugned order is that the ratio followed by the Tribunal in the case of Khurana Engg. Ltd. - 2011 (21) STR 115 (Tribunal-Ahmd.), w....