Upgrade to AI Search ✕

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
     - Overview Summary
     - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     - Relevant Case Laws
     - Tariff / Classification / HSN
     - Expert views from TaxTMI
     - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

2018 (4) TMI 830

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

.....C. Saini, D.R. Shri K. Poddar, D.R. - for the respondent ORDER Per Justice Dr. Satish Chandra: Both the appeals have been filed being a different Order-in-Appeal No. 258 & 231/17-18 dated 28.9.2017 and 19.9.2017. The period of dispute is December 2007 to March, 2010. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of clinker and cement which attracts Centra....

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....u India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE, Bangalore-III - 2009 (14) STR 316 (Tri.-Bang.), which was upheld by the Karnataka High Court. He also submits that the identical issue has been decided in favour of the assessee also in the case of M/s EXL Service Com (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE & ST, LTU - 2017 (5) TMI 1461-CESTAT-New Delhi. 4. On the other hand, Shri Saini, ld. DR has justified the impugned order. He re....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

2018 (4) TMI 830