TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (4) TMI 377
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in CA Nos.92/17 and 93/2017 respectively whereby findings of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in CC Nos.22287/16 and 22185/16 regarding conviction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act were upheld. 2. Revision petition 842/2017 has been filed by the petitioner-M/S R.K. Industries through its proprietor Rajesh Chaudhary to impugn the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 30.10.2017 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in CA No. 96/2017 endorsing the findings of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in CC No.22229/16 regarding conviction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. 3. The revision petitions are contested by the respondent. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... amount was due from him and his wife. He volunteered to add that approximately one or two lacs were due towards him. Apparently, the petitioners had business dealings with the respondent and pursuant to that the cheques in question were issued by him. 8. It has come on record that the respondent was in possession of relevant documents and had offered to produce them if so required. The petitioners did not insist for production of those documents. Adverse inference is to be drawn against the petitioners for not insisting for the production of those documents. Moreover, the petitioners themselves did not produce any document, whatsoever, to show as to how and in what manner the cheques in question were issued in favour of the respondent. Th....