Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (4) TMI 173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....'the Act') qua the assessment year 2006-07 on the ground inter alia that :-  "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and law, whether Ld. CIT (A) has erred in deleting the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Rs. 36,32,553/- which was imposed on the confirmation of the addition of Rs. 68,23,535/- on account of denial of benefit u/s 10(38) in respect of LTCG and addition of Rs. 30,27,182/- on account of discrepancies in valuation of closing stock by Ld. CIT (A) as well as Hon'ble ITAT." 2. Briefly stated the facts necessary for adjudication of the controversy at hand are : On the basis of assessment completed u/s 143(3) of the Act making addition of Rs. 68,23,535/- on account of disallowance CLAIMED u/s 10(38) of the Act in respect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion of Rs. 30,27,182/- on account of discrepancies in the valuation of closing stock by the AO has been affirmed by ld. CIT (A) as well as the Tribunal. 6. In the backdrop of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the sole question arises for determination in this case is :- "as to whether the assessee has concealed particulars of income or has furnished inaccurate particulars of income during assessment proceedings?" 7. So far as question of claiming benefit u/s 10(38) of the Act on account of long term capital gains to the tune of Rs. 68,23,535/- is concerned, the ld. AR for the assessee contended that it is a case of bonafide mistake having tax neutral effect. When undisputedly appeal against the order of the Tribun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ccurate, the assessee cannot be held guilty of furnishing inaccurate particulars. In order to expose the assessee to penalty, unless the case is strictly covered by the provision, the penalty provision cannot be invoked. By no stretch of imagination can making an incorrect claim tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. There can be no dispute that everything would depend upon the return filed by the assessee, because that is the only document where the assessee can furnish the particulars of his income. When such particulars are found to be inaccurate, the liability would arise. To attract penalty, the details supplied in the return must not be accurate, not exact or correct, not according to the truth or erroneous. Where there i....