2018 (4) TMI 101

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sthi, Advocate, for Appellant Shri Rajeev Ranjan, Joint Commissioner (AR), for Respondent Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The present appeal is arising out of Order-in-original No. 10-CE/Commissioner/2011 dated 27/05/2011 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants were engaged in the manufacture of glass articles. Some of the final ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... held that the said procedure was not followed by the appellant and therefore, they were flÜt eligiblc for relief for subsequent period w.e.f. 01.04.2008. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant is before this Tribunal. 3. Heard the learned counsel for appellant. He has submitted that for the period subsequent to 01.04.2008 they have calculated Cenvat credit that was attributable to the goo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....10 0 0 of the value of exempted final  product. 4. Heard the learned A. R. for revenue who has supported the impugned Order-in-Original. 5. Having considered the rival contentions and on perusal of records, we find that the details about the attributable Cenvat credit availed in respect of goods which were cleared at nil rate of duty for the period from 01.04.2008 to 30.092009 is not....