TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (4) TMI 101
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Rajeev Ranjan, Joint Commissioner (AR), for Respondent Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The present appeal is arising out of Order-in-original No. 10-CE/Commissioner/2011 dated 27/05/2011 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants were engaged in the manufacture of glass articles. Some of the final products were exempted from Central Excise ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....wed by the appellant and therefore, they were flÜt eligiblc for relief for subsequent period w.e.f. 01.04.2008. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant is before this Tribunal. 3. Heard the learned counsel for appellant. He has submitted that for the period subsequent to 01.04.2008 they have calculated Cenvat credit that was attributable to the goods which were cleared at nil rate of duty and....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....roduct. 4. Heard the learned A. R. for revenue who has supported the impugned Order-in-Original. 5. Having considered the rival contentions and on perusal of records, we find that the details about the attributable Cenvat credit availed in respect of goods which were cleared at nil rate of duty for the period from 01.04.2008 to 30.092009 is not available on record. Therefore, we considered it t....