2018 (3) TMI 1529
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Devika Jain, Advs. O R D E R The Revenue's appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act alleges that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) erred in allowing `2,09,63,780/- as a capital expense. That amount was the quantum of discount given in respect of the SAR (Stock Appreciation Rights) - similar to Employee Stock Option (ESO) offered by the employer to the work force. The ITAT follo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he shares and the value at which the shares were allotted to the employee is allowable as an expenditure. The Commissioner of Income Tax revised this claim accepted by the Officer and held that the accounting treatment prescribed by SEBI, nowhere suggests that it was a revenue expenditure to be debited to the Profit and Loss Account as it was only a notional and contingent expenditure. In the c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed before this Court viz., on the issue of expenditure of 66.82 lakhs towards the issue of shares to the Employees Stock Option is concerned, the Tribunal pointed out that the shares were issued to the employees only for the interest of the business of the assessee to induce employees to work in the best interest of the assessee. The allotment of shares was done by the assessee in strict complianc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iability depending on the various factors on which the assessee had no control. The expenditure in this behalf was an ascertained liability, thus the expenditure incurred being on lines of the SEBI guidelines, there could be no interference in the relief granted by the Assessing Authority for the expenditure arising on account of Employees Stock Option Plan. This expenditure incurred as per SEBI g....


TaxTMI