AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (3) TMI 1447
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....omission in the regularly kept books of account, the CIT(A) erred in confirming its rejection simply in the /absence of complete vouchers for purchases, wages etc. which by Date of Hearing 07.02.2018 Date of Pronouncement 28.03.2018 itself would not be sufficient to hold that true profits of the business cannot be ascertained. 3. Because the CIT(A) was wrong in observing that 95% of the contract receipts have been claimed as deduction ignoring the opening and closing of work in progress. 4. Because the appellant, a civil contractor, had to incur incumbent expenditure over building material wages etc. without which the work could not be executed. In the absence of availability of complete vouchers, the comparable reasonable....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t of expenses on self made vouchers which are not open to verification. He further noted that the payments have mostly been made in cash for below Rs. 20,000/- in respect of purchases. The CIT(A) sustained the addition on the ground that more than 95% of the receipts has been claimed as deduction under the head purchases and wages. 5. The ld. Counsel for the assessee has contended that the books of account of the appellant were duly audited u/s 44AB and the audit report was duly submitted before the AO, the application of net profit percentage of 8% by invoking the provisions of section 145(3) is wrong and unwarranted; that in the absence of any error or omission in the regularly kept books of account, the CIT(A) erred in confirming its ....