2018 (3) TMI 1382
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Respondent : No Appearance JUDGMENT ( Judgment of this Court was made by S. Manikumar, J. ) Being aggrieved by the Final Order No.357 of 2010, dated 24.03.2010, on the file of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench, instant Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed on the following substantial questions of law:- "(i) Whether the Hon'ble CESTAT,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... been admitted and notice has been ordered on 18.11.2010. Notice taken by the appellant has been returned in the year 2010, with postal endorsement "No such Company in the address. Returned to the sender". 3. As per the registry's note, second batta with petition is due on service to the sole respondent. More than 7 years have lapsed, since the return of notice. 4. Perusal of the m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Tax / Commissioner, Directorate of Legal Affairs. 4. [email protected] Sir/Madam, Sub: - Reduction of Government litigation - providing monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department before CESTAT - regarding. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to Service Tax vide Section 83 of the Finance ....
TaxTMI