2017 (10) TMI 1300

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondents:  Mr.V.Sundareswaran, for R1 ORDER Heard Mr.V.Bhiman, for M/s.Samapthkumar and Associates, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Sudareswaran, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the first respondent.  None appears for the second respondent.  With consent on either side, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2.It was reported before this Court....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....  In terms of Section 129 A(1) of the Customs Act, the petitioner has an appellate remedy before the CESTAT.  Therefore, the petitioner has to necessarily avail the said remedy instead of approaching this Court by way of a writ petition. 5.Learned counsel for the petitioner would point out that the impugned order was passed on 18.04.2017, and as of now, if an appeal is filed, it would ....