Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (3) TMI 1291

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellate Tribunal vide its order dated 5th July, 2006 rejected their application for waiver of pre-deposit and gave the appellant 45 days from that day to deposit the said penalty. It appears that this period was further extended vide the tribunal order dated 19th January, 2007 as recorded in the final order dated 21st May, 2009. The final order reads as under:- "Para 4:- From the perusal of the above it is clear that it is the mandatory obligation on the part of the appellants to make pre-deposit of the penalty at the time of filing the appeal. This tribunal had shown enough latitude when permitting further period of 45 days vide order dated 19.01.2007". However, at the time of passing the final order on 21st May, 2009 they had sti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld that what is relevant is as to whether a party seeking condonation of delay has made out a case of sufficient cause or not. (iii) The Supreme Court decision dated 19.02.1987 in Collector Land Acquisition Anantnag & Anr. V/s MST. Katiji and others; wherein the test of „sufficient cause‟ for condoning a delay in filing of appeal was the issue. He therefore argued that the powers of condoning the delay in filing the appeal was very much there with the appellate tribunal and in the present case the appellant being a poor man who was duped by his associates, because of his illiteracy and innocence is a sufficient cause for condoning the delay, and recalling the earlier order so that justice could be meted out to the appellant. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... not received copy of any such order..... Please supply me a copy of the order." Exactly when and how he got to know is not spelt out. So in January 2011 the appellant writes a letter to the Registry about the said final order dated 21.05.2009 but in the Review Application says that he got to know about the said order on 14th December, 2011. Moreover, there is available on record a copy of a letter in Subject "Appeal No. 75,76/2006" dated 26.05.2009 from the Asst. Registrar of the Appellate Tribunal addressed to the appellant stating "a certified true copy of the final order passed by the Tribunal on 21.05.2009 in the above mentioned RP/Appeal is forwarded herewith for information and necessary action." All the above proves that the condu....