Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (3) TMI 1054

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ufactured tobacco falling under CH 24.01 of CETA, 1985. The appellant had intimated the Dept. on 30.10.2015 about non production of finished good using FFS machine during the month of November 2015, under the Chewing Tobacco and unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty), Rules 2010. They have intimated the Dept. about the commencement of the production of 5 gm pouches bearing MRP Rs. 3/- of unmanufactured Tobacco on FFS packing machine with effect from 1.12.2015. Later they have intimated the Dept. on 4.12.2015 their intention to stop production of goods from 10.12.2015. Consequently, their FFS packing machine was sealed by the jurisdictional Superintendent in the mid-night of 9/10.12.2015. Thus....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....015 and 31.12.2015 after filing necessary intimation and following the procedure laid down under Rule 10 of the Chewing Tobacco and unmanufactured Tobacco Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty). The Ld Commissioner (Appeals) erred in rejecting the refund claim observing that the appellant had not intimated the fact of production of un-manufactured Tobacco utilizing their FFS packaging machine of pouches of 8 gms/10 gms bearing the MRP of Rs. 5/-, therefore, they are not eligible to the abatement claim for the closure of the factory during the said period. 4. The Ld AR for the Revenue reiterated the findings of the Ld Commissioner (Appeals). 5. I find the undisputed facts are that the appellant during the peri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fect with the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise or the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, with a copy to the Superintendent of Central Excise, at least three working days prior to the commencement of said period, who on receipt of such intimation shall direct for sealing of all the packing machines available in the factory for the said period under the physical supervision of Superintendent of Central Excise, in the manner that the packing machines so sealed cannot be operated during the said period : Provided that during such period, no manufacturing activity, whatsoever, in respect of notified goods shall be undertaken and no removal of notified goods shall be effected by the manufacturer except tha....